More Massachusetts city and town clerks say they won’t obey Gov. Romney’s order to enforce the law. Massachusetts law forbids the issuance of marriage licenses to out-of-state couples where their marriage would be illegal in their home jurisdiction. Since those who wholeheartedly embrace the homosexual activist agenda want as many gay marriages as possible on May 17, the clerks are saying that they won’t check residency and will just issue the licenses.
Hey, why should they obey the law? After all, in Liberal World, if a law is inconvenient get a judge to overrule or just ignore. Who cares about the rule of law? Anarchy in the promotion of liberalism is no vice, right?
Just as certain towns and cities in the US have become homosexual magnets, so too will the entire state of Massachusetts. It is on its way to becoming the Sodomy State. And on that note, it’s no coincidence that Boston has been one of the primary epicenters of the priestly homosexual molestation scandal – with over a HUNDRED priests dismissed, one CARDINAL resigned, hundreds of boys molested and thousands of individual acts of homosexual molestation – or that that state was involved in the ‘fisting’ scandal of only a couple years ago – in which children, under state auspices, were taught how to insert their hands into the rectums of others. The only sad person from this development will be Teddy Kennedy, who may not be able to find any women with whom to cavort. The state of Massachusetts has decided to celebrate sodomy, to make sodomitic acts equivalent under law to the act which creates new human life in the bond of marriage between man and woman. It will go on to teach children such, and to tell them that sodomy is normal, natural, good and healthy. If I lived in Massachusetts, I’d move.
What about the clerks who refuse to license ANY gay marriages based upon THEIR interpretation of the law and constitution.
It seems that if you give one group of clerks a pass, you’ve got to give the other group a pass.
The message from this is that a vocal, wealthy and in-your-face minority that screams at every perceived slight wins the day in our form of democracy against a wimpy, silenced, and cowering majority.
Domenico, sinner, Patrick,
Defiance of law and legal authorities to an extent undreamed of a few years ago is now commonplace. Where are we headed? Chaos will not long be tolerated.
Consider this scenario.
The courts have been riding high since they discovered that there is no one with sufficient courage to oppose them. For the most part, we have been obeying them while holding our noses. A few days ago I read of a number of police departments defying a court order with which they do not agree. Will this spread? Of course it will as long as it is seen that the judicial tiger has no claws. What response will the arrogant justices make?
They will fight to retain the power they have usurped.
The one thing that the courts do not have is an effective police power – so they will have to create one either by expanding the court officer system or by seizing a police force.
Where will they get the money? By usurping state or town budgets. They have done that before. Alternatively, when faced with a reluctant police chief they simply seize the force and its budget while replacing the chief with a court-appointed administrator.
Preposterous, you say? All of the pieces have been used before in the service of social engineering. As long as the courts attempt this on behalf of those who intimidate a large portion of the legislature, the coup will become a fait accompli. The other branches of government will be, even more than they are now, servants of the unelected elites.
Do you think that the Boston Globe will be at all concerned as this scenario unfolds?
The state house beat could be turned over to the entertainment editor.
Domenico, sinner, Patrick,
Defiance of law and legal authorities to an extent undreamed of a few years ago is now commonplace. Where are we headed? Chaos will not long be tolerated.
Consider this scenario.
The courts have been riding high since they discovered that there is no one with sufficient courage to oppose them. For the most part, we have been obeying them while holding our noses. A few days ago I read of a number of police departments defying a court order with which they do not agree. Will this spread? Of course it will as long as it is seen that the judicial tiger has no claws. What response will the arrogant justices make?
They will fight to retain the power they have usurped.
The one thing that the courts do not have is an effective police power – so they will have to create one either by expanding the court officer system or by seizing a police force.
Where will they get the money? By usurping state or town budgets. They have done that before. Alternatively, when faced with a reluctant police chief they simply seize the force and its budget while replacing the chief with a court-appointed administrator.
Preposterous, you say? All of the pieces have been used before in the service of social engineering. As long as the courts attempt this on behalf of those who intimidate a large portion of the legislature, the coup will become a fait accompli. The other branches of government will be, even more than they are now, servants of the unelected elites.
Do you think that the Boston Globe will be at all concerned as this scenario unfolds?
The state house beat could be turned over to the entertainment editor.
Wow, R&B… I think the end of the judicial tyranny thing will come when the people get so fed up they start to use their impeachment powers. At the federal level, there is impeachment, PLUS the Constitutional limiting of issues which may be ajudicated federally (now being considered in Congress). Finally, we may be forced to amend constitutions – as is now occurring around the country with regard to homosexual ‘marriage.’ But I agree. It’s frightening. The most frightening thing? Most people aren’t yet frightened.