Silence of the bishops

Silence of the bishops

Fr. Rob discusses whether there is a “different ‘level of communication’” among priests, as alleged by Amy Welborn. I think he misunderstands what Amy is talking about, but his response does include some very important truths.

Regarding the former, having lived with priests, I can testify to the fact that most priests talk about their brother priests and bishops in much more candid terms than they would with anyone else. The faults and failings are much more obvious to them and residual effects of a certain pedestal-raising clericalism don’t apply to them. Plus, they also find it more prudent to not cause scandal to their parishioners and most lay friends by candidly discussing certain problems in the Church and so they turn to their brother priests for that.

Now, as to the latter, Fr. Rob is right on with regard to bishops. What we have seen in the past few years is clear evidence that most bishops won’t criticize or fraternally correct one of their brother bishops. To be sure, there has been some mild criticism, but almost always after the fact, when everything had been made public. But has any bishop called for another bishop to resign by name and before his hand had already been forced? No.

  • I think it is very interesting the Fr. Tom DiLorenzo has been calling for the removal of Fr. Walter Cuenin on his radio show!  (RC Archdiocese of Boston stuff)

    So much for no criticism!  BUt this is an isolated case.

    Perhaps this is the war among the priests Our Lady spoke of to Fr. Gobi?