As someone mentioned in the comments below, John Geoghan’s murderer proves my point: He did it for the children. Oh then it’s okay.
As someone mentioned in the comments below, John Geoghan’s murderer proves my point: He did it for the children. Oh then it’s okay.
From the Boston Globe:
“John H. LaChance, a Framingham lawyer appointed to represent Druce, said yesterday that Druce harbors anger at pedophiles. Druce, 37, is serving a life sentence for murdering a man he believed made a sexual advance toward him.”
http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2003/08/28/geoghan_was_in_unit_for_aggressive_cases/
Huh? Did I just dream that I read in the Globe a few days ago that Druce “hated homosexuals” and that he is serving a life sentence for murdering a man he “believed to be a homosexual”?
What a crock.