Uncategorized

Thoughts on “The Passion”

3 commentsMarch 1, 20042 min read

I’m not going to link to every review of The Passion I see online (which would be impossible), but I think my friend Melanie has some interesting reflections on it, including some thoughts on the medium used to convey the message.

Then a welcome blackness. The rolling of the credits was terrible. I didnid isPermaLink="false">https://www.bettnet.com/?p=2628

Columnist James Pinkerton says legalized gay marriage is inevitable. He says that it will be a matter of fact in the next five to 10 years. I might agree.

After all, in 1965, no one thought abortion would be legalized on demand with a few years. It’s the same way with other social engineering initiatives. The camel’s nose peeks under the tent and pretty soon you have the whole camel in there with you.

What is happening now is that you have elected officials ignoring the law in order to push the gay agenda and no law enforcement authorities have the guts or willingness to enforce the law. And a law that no one will enforce is no law at all.

I’m not sure I would call what gays are doing “conservative.” I think it’s a smokescreen to assert that large numbers of homosexuals want to get married and settle down and live a perfect, continent domestic life. But the agenda is correct: to pass a veneer or respectability and normality over a deviant lifestyle so that it will be accepted by the rest of us and perceived as more common than it is. Remember only about 1 percent of the US population is gay, not 10 percent or more as they claim.

Facebook X

3 comments

Charleen says:

March 1, 2004 at 3:52 pm

Well this would be a great way to control us “breeders” if they can succeed. I mean how can we protest who or how are kids are taught and what they are taught if we loose this basic human family building block? If they can control marriage then comes the laws to control how many kids and who is allowed to raise them and so on…..right. And then the “problem” of world overpopulation is under control because not many kids would be borne and those that were would be controlled by anyone other than us “breeders”. Evil has a great agenda and a very sly method to gain control in this world by changing what is accepted and tolerated. Next will be they pedophilias and other child molesters and how can we say that they should not be accepted because if we allow SSM how can we not say that anyone should not be able to live out their choices and have the freedom to do so. Lord help us to stop this long black train before it’s totally left the station.
Domenico Bettinelli says:

March 1, 2004 at 4:14 pm

I agree with most of what you say, except about promiscuity. Rampant promiscuity in a population leads to many societal problems. Humanity is made for monogamy and promiscuity leads to breakdowns in trust, mental illness, inability to form relationships, emotional distress, even crime (i.e. crimes of passion), and so on. Okay, we’re not going to be outlawing fornication anytime soon, but we can’t deny its effect.
Charleen says:

March 2, 2004 at 7:01 pm

But the problem with doing that is it’s a little nudge to opening the gate just like Roe vs. Wade did and once that gate is opened when do you shut it? After the bull is out of the barn so to speak it’s too late, so just where is the line. I don’t think destroying the basic family building block is the way to go. And how can you stop the other agendas that might be wrong now from normalizing their agendas if we don’t stop this destruction of the basis of society.